Regarding Prince Andrew

I would advise those dropping Prince Andrew to get a photo check to see if the photo has been adapted.

Do you know what to look for in the faking of a photo?

And it does matter that one know the circumstance around a person getting a photo with someone. What does that mean?

Does it mean, "Can I have a photo for my media accounts?"

I feel there is more involved.

I speak as a photo editor professional.

This event decries against the wisdom of doing selfies with adorateurs.

Should leaders take selfies with adorateurs?

And being Prince, how many adorateurs does he have?

And how many thousands upon thousands of pictures are there out there, and how many will get turned up in a royal hack?

If this creates a precidence, all those who did selfies with their followers will be waiting for the next legal gig.

Unfortunately, I would advice the royal family to reduce these photo ops with the public. We are in that age of the legal gig being a money payout, and a social disgracer, rather than being one which permits favor transacted between royalty and the social public.

Does being with a group improve the photo op? I don't know.

This overall recommendation also applies to nation leaders, and those occupying social position of interest.

Family historians who are missing a family member in their image opportunity merge photos. You take an image of similar size, clip a head, and copy paste the image into place. Has that happened?

The realism is you get an image of the person at that approximate age, and clip it in. Because we see it, we assume truth. Is it truth? And who is paying x person to do the deed?

What political aims are present? To see a royal loss, who wins?

Royals need to note the goings on around the world, because the legal hack is making unfortunate gains, and the media are participants. Is there a media outlet royals can trust? I kind of wonder.

Lord, I call out into being a media outlet in the UK which Royals can trust. I call this in, such that there is one who is for truth. If there is a spread of the dishonest, bring forth your brand over a media chain, and stand in the UK, Lord. Send an angel to bring forward media truth in the UK.

Lord, if Prince Andrew is to be cleared of allegations, by you, do this by a month prior to his family wedding. And if he is guilty of something, let him come clean before you, Lord, and repent, and be transformed. And bring him in alignment with Kingdom. ⛳🤵📛📿

I would examine the photo paper. Examine the print marks on the back. Examine the inks. What was the image printed on? What ink was used?

I think the integrity of the image must be dealt with first. However, as to the larger matter of human trafficking, Prince Andrew, if you can help hit that down, I would greatly appreciate it.

Hit it down. Help end it.

Human trafficking is a horror to humanity. Prince Andrew, use the man you are to shake the foundations of human trafficking.

I assume the photo is already held as evidence today. If it is, old pictures have dust. If there is no dust, you might ask why. Most old pictures have imperfections in the top layer. There's small imperfections like dust. If you don't see any, ask why.

Where was it stored? Who found it? Who accessed it? Was the picture taken with intent for future extortion?